SE

This educational application supplements, but does not replace, the official AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, applicable state DOT manuals, project specifications, and professional engineering judgment.

Graded quiz

Chapter 5 — Bridge Deck Analysis and Design (8 questions)

Chapter 5 — Bridge Deck Analysis and Design (8 questions)

20 questions · PE-exam format · 70% to pass · attempts save to your progress record when signed in.

Work each item to the requested precision. Use the Show clue button only after an honest attempt — hints reveal the AASHTO section and setup, not the answer.

  1. Q1

    The AASHTO §4.6.2.1 equivalent-strip method for deck slab analysis provides:

  2. Q2

    Girder spacing S = 8 ft. Compute positive-moment equivalent strip width E+ (in) = 26.0 + 6.6·S.

    in
  3. Q3

    Same S = 8 ft: compute negative-moment strip E− (in) = 48.0 + 3.0·S.

    in
  4. Q4

    The AASHTO §9.7.2 empirical design method for concrete deck slabs relies on:

  5. Q5

    Deck slab, 12-in-wide strip, d = 7.5 in, As = 0.62 in²/ft (#5 @ 6″), fy = 60 ksi, f'c = 4 ksi. Compute a = Asfy/(0.85 f'c b) (in).

    in

    Deck slab strip — 12″ wide

    b = 12d = 7.5#5 @ 6″
  6. Q6

    Same strip: compute φMn = φAsfy(d − a/2), φ = 0.90 (k-ft/ft).

    k-ft/ft

    Singly-reinforced beam

    b = 12d = 7.5#5 @ 6″
  7. Q7

    Minimum concrete deck slab thickness per §9.7.1.1 is:

  8. Q8

    Deck DL: 8-in slab, γc = 150 pcf, 2-in FWS at 140 pcf. Compute total unit DL (psf).

    psf
  9. Q9

    For deck slab design, the truck axle load applied per wheel is:

    HL-93 design truck

    8 kip32 kip32 kip14 ft14–30 ft
  10. Q10

    Deck live-load moment: axle 32 kip on strip E+ = 78.8 in, transverse span (girder spacing) S = 8 ft. Approximate positive moment per foot: M ≈ (P/E)·(S/4) with IM = 1.75. Compute using P = 32 kip (both wheels close), E in ft. Report M (k-ft/ft) — simplified.

    k-ft/ft
  11. Q11

    AASHTO Table A4-1 provides:

  12. Q12

    Deck overhang 4 ft from CL of girder to face of curb. Wheel P = 16 kip located 1 ft in from curb face (i.e., a = 3 ft from girder). Compute wheel moment (k-ft) at fascia girder.

    k-ft

    Deck overhang — wheel load 1 ft from barrier

    P = 16 kipL = 4 ft
  13. Q13

    Deck overhang design must consider (§13.4.1) three cases. Case 1 is:

  14. Q14

    TL-4 barrier: transverse force Ft = 54 kip distributed over Lt = 3.5 ft, applied at height He = 32 in. Compute moment at deck (top of overhang) per foot width for 1-ft strip directly under load (k-ft/ft).

    k-ft/ft
  15. Q15

    Minimum deck reinforcement per §5.10.6 (isotropic bottom reinforcement for empirical decks):

  16. Q16

    Distribution reinforcement (secondary, bottom) as % of primary steel, for primary parallel to traffic:

  17. Q17

    Primary reinforcement perpendicular to traffic, S = 8 ft. Compute distribution reinforcement ratio (%).

    %
  18. Q18

    Concrete cover on top deck reinforcement (concrete exposed to deicing salts) per §5.10.1:

  19. Q19

    Simple-span deck strip between girders, S = 8 ft, wDL = 0.123 klf (100 psf slab). Compute midspan positive DL moment per foot (k-ft/ft).

    k-ft/ft

    Deck strip DL per foot

    w = 0.123 k/ftL = 8 ft
  20. Q20

    Deck slab required area of steel: Mu = 8.5 k-ft/ft, φ = 0.9, jd ≈ 0.9d = 0.9(7.5) = 6.75 in, fy = 60 ksi. Compute As,req = Mu/(φ fy jd) in in²/ft.

    in²/ft
Submit worked PE solutions (PDF)

Upload a PDF of your handwritten or typed worked-out solutions. Your instructor receives it directly and can grade partial credit that the auto-grader missed.

No file selected

Bridge Engineering and Design Using AASHTO LRFD

Graduate interactive textbook for civil engineering students. Aligned to AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 10th Edition (2024).

Regional focus

Maryland & Mid-Atlantic — MDOT SHA, VDOT, PennDOT, FHWA.

Educational notice

This educational application supplements, but does not replace, the official AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, applicable state DOT manuals, project specifications, and professional engineering judgment.

© 2026 Dr. Steve Efe, Ph.D. All Rights Reserved.

Developed for engineering education. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or commercial use is prohibited.

v1.0 · Reference edition · Aligned to AASHTO LRFD, 10th Edition (2024)